***Reserved for Ultimate_Writer**

PLEASE NOTE: You will need to read the Southwood School: A Case Study in Recruitment and Selection before you respond to any of the HR Case Evaluation assignments.HR Case Evaluation #1Use the table provided or create one of your own using the program of your choice—MS Word, MS Excel, etc.—to define each selection method. Explain the nature of the method and its importance. Then list all the advantages and disadvantages for each selection method. Use as many references as necessary (minimum of 4) to support your explanations and the advantages and disadvantages. In a separate short report (2-3 pages), recommend the most appropriate selection method or combination of selection methods for this case study, explaining your rationale. Present at least 3 scholarly sources to support your rationale using APA format.Cover Page with Name, Date, and Title of AssignmentUse headings to separate the sections of the reportPage numbersDouble-spacingTimes New Roman, size 12In-text citations to sources in APA styleReference page using APA styleReferences not older than 3 years oldStart Date Feb 2, 2017 4:23 PMDue Date Mar 12, 2017 11:30 PMAttachments Template1.doc (39.5 KB)   Download All FilesHide RubricsRubric Name: HR Case Evaluation #1 – Rubric 1      Criteria 1Advanced0.75 pointsSatisfactory0.65 pointsPartial0.55 pointsNot Satisfactory0 pointsDefinition and Explanation of Psychometric testsAccurate definition and comprehensive explanation.Accurate definition and sufficient explanation.Definitions presented slight inaccuracies. Explanation is lacking a detailed description.Inaccurate definition and little to no explanation.Definition and Explanation of Resume or curriculum vitae reviewAccurate definition and comprehensive explanation.Accurate definition and sufficient explanation.Definitions presented slight inaccuracies. Explanation is lacking a detailed description.Inaccurate definition and little to no explanation.Definition and Explanation of Formal (Structured) InterviewAccurate definition and comprehensive explanation.Accurate definition and sufficient explanation.Definitions presented slight inaccuracies. Explanation is lacking a detailed description.Inaccurate definition and little to no explanation.Definition and Explanation of Informal InterviewAccurate definition and comprehensive explanation.Accurate definition and sufficient explanation.Definitions presented slight inaccuracies. Explanation is lacking a detailed description.Inaccurate definition and little to no explanation.Definition and Explanation of Teaching ObservationAccurate definition and comprehensive explanation.Accurate definition and sufficient explanation.Definitions presented slight inaccuracies. Explanation is lacking a detailed description.Inaccurate definition and little to no explanation.Definition and Explanation of Presentation to candidates to a panel of teachersAccurate definition and comprehensive explanation.Accurate definition and sufficient explanation.Definitions presented slight inaccuracies. Explanation is lacking a detailed description.Inaccurate definition and little to no explanation.Definition and Explanation of Online TestingAccurate definition and comprehensive explanation.Accurate definition and sufficient explanation.Definitions presented slight inaccuracies. Explanation is lacking a detailed description.Inaccurate definition and little to no explanation.Definition and Explanation of ReferencesAccurate definition and comprehensive explanation.Accurate definition and sufficient explanation.Definitions presented slight inaccuracies. Explanation is lacking a detailed description.Inaccurate definition and little to no explanation.Criteria 2Advanced0.75 pointsSatisfactory0.65 pointsPartial0.55 pointsNot Satisfactory0 pointsAdvantages/Disadvanges of Psychometric testsAll advantages/disadvantages listed are accurate and complete.No more than two advantage/disadvantages are missing or inaccurate.More than two advantage/disadvantages are missing or inaccurate.No advantages/disadvantages listed.Advantages/Disadvantages of Resume or curriculum vitae reviewAll advantages/disadvantages listed are accurate and complete.No more than two advantage/disadvantages are missing or inaccurate.More than two advantage/disadvantages are missing or inaccurate.No advantages/disadvantages listed.Advantages/Disadvantages of Formal (Structured) InterviewAll advantages/disadvantages listed are accurate and complete.No more than two advantage/disadvantages are missing or inaccurate.More than two advantage/disadvantages are missing or inaccurate.No advantages/disadvantages listed.Advantages/Disadvantages of Informal InterviewAll advantages/disadvantages listed are accurate and complete.No more than two advantage/disadvantages are missing or inaccurate.More than two advantage/disadvantages are missing or inaccurate.No advantages/disadvantages listed.Advantages/Disadvantages of Teaching ObservationAll advantages/disadvantages listed are accurate and complete.No more than two advantage/disadvantages are missing or inaccurate.More than two advantage/disadvantages are missing or inaccurate.No advantages/disadvantages listed.Advantages/Disadvantages of Presentation to candidates to a panel of teachersAll advantages/disadvantages listed are accurate and complete.No more than two advantage/disadvantages are missing or inaccurate.More than two advantage/disadvantages are missing or inaccurate.No advantages/disadvantages listed.Advantages/Disadvantages of Online TestingAll advantages/disadvantages listed are accurate and complete.No more than two advantage/disadvantages are missing or inaccurate.More than two advantage/disadvantages are missing or inaccurate.No advantages/disadvantages listed.Advantages/Disadvantages of ReferencesAll advantages/disadvantages listed are accurate and complete.No more than two advantage/disadvantages are missing or inaccurate.More than two advantage/disadvantages are missing or inaccurate.No advantages/disadvantages listed.Criteria 3Advanced5 pointsSatisfactory4.5 pointsPartial4 pointsNot Satisfactory0 pointsRecommendation of Selection MethodAccurate and complete recommendation.  Rationale is thoughtful and comprehensive.  Accurate recommendation.  Rationale supports recommendation.Accurate recommendation.  Rationale is not complete.Inaccurate recommendation and/or rationale does not support recommendation.Criteria 4Advanced1.6 pointsSatisfactory1.47 pointsPartial1.39 pointsNot Satisfactory0 pointsUse credible reasoning and evidence in communication.Concepts and ideas are fully developed and supported with credible sources. Reader can easily follow the author’s logic and reasoning.Concepts and ideas are developed and supported with credible sources.  Summary idea presentation is not cohesive.   At times the writing forces the reader to determine the author’s train of thought.Concepts and themes are not fully developed, presented in a cohesive manner or appropriately supported. Accurate use of resourcesIncorporate sufficient use of appropriate research, supporting evidence, and relevant sources.  Describes characteristics of essential information resources, including their limitations, and explains strategies for identifying and finding such resources.Incorporate sufficient use of appropriate research, supporting evidence, and relevant sources.  Does not describe all characteristics of essential information resources, including their limitations, and explains strategies for identifying and finding such resources.Insufficient use of appropriate research, supporting evidence, and relevant sources. Limited characteristics of essential information and resources presented.Insufficient use of appropriate research, supporting evidence, and relevant sources.APA Guidelines for in-text citations and ReferencesThe paper correctly cites in-text and lists three resources on the References page.  If additional sources are used, they are included correctly.The majority of in-text citations and the reference are properly cited; formatting is inconsistent/inaccurate in a few cases.References are cited but incorrectly under APA style. The student has either used another format or incorrectly applied the APA style guidelines.Inconsistent or missing in-text citations; fails to attribute an author’s word through APA citations. Writing MechanicsStrictly adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including, but not limited to capitalization and punctuation and spelling.  No errors found. No jargon used.Adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including capitalization and punctuation and spelling.  One to three errors found.Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including capitalization and punctuation and spelling. Over three errors found.Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including capitalization and punctuation and spelling.  Over ten errors found.Followed InstructionsStrictly adheres to the instructions for the assignment. Completes each section comprehensively.Adheres to the instructions for the assignment. Completes each section appropriately.Minimally adheres to the instructions. Doesn’t complete each section appropriately or correctly.Does not adhere to the instructions. Does not complete each section.Overall ScoreA: 22.5-2522.5 or moreB: 20-22.2520 or moreC: 17.5-19.7517.5 or moreDoes not meet expectations0 or more