The use of technological platforms to improve patient flow
Assignment Instructions
Title is: The use of technological platforms to improve patient flow
Task 1: Problem Statement Outline Using the Work titled Effective Problem Statements and Research Questions as a guide, develop a bullet point outline for the problem statement. Each bullet should be a single sentence.
Following the specific problem sentence include a short sentence describing how this problem is related to your cognate (My cognate is Healthcare Management). Finally, add APA formatted references for the supporting reference sentences. Following the outline, you will provide an annotated bibliography for each reference provided. (I will upload a sample APA format to use)
You will post your submission as a word document. Your submission will include the following: Title Block ·Last Name, First Name ·Cognate ·Research Project Track (Dissertation or Project) ·Research Paradigm ·Planned Research Design ·Proposed Topic
Problem Statement Bullet Outline ·General Problem Sentence oSupporting Reference Sentence with Current Citation (< 5 years)oSupporting Reference Sentence with Current Citation (< 5 years)oSupporting Reference Sentence with Current Citation (< 5 years)oSupporting
Reference Sentence with Current Citation (< 5 years, optional bridge supporting references sentence, see problem statement work) ·Specific Problem Sentence ·Relationship to Cognate (Not part of the problem statement) ·References Annotated Bibliography for each Reference APA formatted reference (250 words for each reference) ·Description of why this is a credible source (author(s), publication, date) ·Summary of the article and help with assignment ·Discussion of how this reference supports the existence of the general problem and the consequences of the problem identified in the general problem sentence.
Topic: HIV/AIDS prevention for college students
Part 1
Use the 3rd person: introduce your given topic, after you researched the topic:
– a) Cite info about your patient’s/population’s disability/disease/condition;
– b) Cite how the disability/disease/condition affects their learning and or how they learn.
– c) (3 to 6 short paragraphs. (One paragraph includes 3 complete sentences).
– Sources: CDC, Mayo Clinic-official, Medlineplus.gov; Miller & Stoeckel’s (2019), chapter 7 (If you don’t have Miller’s book you can borrow it from WCU library-virtually or rent it from the publisher at homework help).
– Note: This is a work about teaching, not about the disease/condition. It’s not a care plan. Do not develop a scenario, just answer what’s asked. It does not need to “flow.”
OBHR Comparative Case Study (20%)
Individual assignment
Please read the guidelines thoroughly else it will cost you grades.
Due: Week 11 (by the end of class hours)
Prepare a 1000-word comparative case study. Adhere to the following format while preparing the case study.
- Choose two well documented case studies of different organizations.
- One case study should be based on success story like Apple, Google, Microsoft.
- Other case study should focus on organizational failure/project failure etc. like Blueberry, Nokia, Yahoo.
- Analyze the organizational structure and culture for both organizations.
- What is the mode of communication adopted by both organizations? How do employees interact with each other?
- What kind of leadership style these organizations prefer/follow? What is the management style of both organizations?
- Explain how the organizational culture, structure and management style effects/relates to the success and failure of the organization?
- What is the HR Strategic planning, recruitment and selection strategy, performance/ talent management strategy of both the organizations?
- Based on the analysis performed propose suggestions and recommendations (5-6) based on the OBHR concepts learned in the course for both organizations.
Report Requirements
- The report must include a title page, table of contents, introduction, multiple supporting body paragraphs, conclusion and list of references.
- Students must use a minimum of 5 references..
- Students must use APA format when citing literature.
- Students are encouraged to use Grammarly to avoid plagiarism. If plagiarism is identified in the work, the student will receive a zero for the assignment.
- Do not exceed the word-limit. Marks will be deducted for excessive length.
APA writing conventions should be followed in the report with a minimum of ten (10) sources referenced and cited including in-text citations (if you are presenting another author’s ideas in your own language you still have to provide the in-text citation of that author), references in APA format, the report must demonstrate analysis of the material and its application to the workplace. Title of the company cannot be your report title due to copyright reasons.
The submission date is mentioned in the course schedule (i.e., week 11) in course syllabus. All submissions will be made on Moodle. Please note that assignment help submissions are ONLY accepted on Moodle and NOT on email. Kindly rename your assignment file by your respective name before you upload. For example, if John Smith is submitting his assignment his assignment file name should be “Johnsmith”.
The report will be graded from 20% as per the rubric mentioned below.
Appendix – A
Assessment Rubric for OBHR Comparative Case Study
1-4 Scale
1
2
3
4
Percentage Score
Weight
0-59
59-71
72-77
78-81
82-84
85-89
88-91
92-100
Grades
F
C
B-
B
B+
A-
A
A+
Mastery Level
Beginning
Developing
Competent
Mastery
Standard Level
Below Standard
Approaching Standard
At Standard
Exceeds Standard
Executive Summary/
Abstract
5
Executive summary or Abstract missing or poorly constructed
Executive summary or Abstract inadequate
Executive Summary or Abstract Executed Adequately
Executive Summary or Abstract Executed in
Problem Identification & Scope
10
Shows little understanding of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues.
Shows some understanding of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues.
Shows adequate knowledge of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues.
Shows superior knowledge of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues.
Content
10
Does not address the case question with little relevant evidence (e.g., details, examples, facts, and expert opinions)
Central idea and clarity of purpose are absent or incompletely expressed and maintained
Lacks most of the necessary case parts
Does not comments on (/evaluates) the differences
Not all the major similarities and / or differences have been a (e.g., details, examples, facts, and expert opinions)
Includes only a few of the necessary case parts
Central idea and clarity of purpose are expressed though perhaps too vaguely or broadly
Only minimally comments on (/evaluates) the differences
Generally for https://smashingessays.com/category/assignment-help/, addresses the case question by providing most major similarities and / or differences but loses focus at times by focusing on minor details
Uses a few details, examples, facts, and expert opinions to elaborate on similarities and / or differences
Includes most of the necessary case parts
Comments on (/evaluates) some of the differences
Addresses the case question by providing all major similarities and / or differences
Uses some details, examples, facts, and expert opinions) to elaborate on the similarities and / or differences
Includes all the case parts
Comments on (/evaluates) the differences
Case Analysis
15
Analysis of case poor analysis of issues of the case, supporting detail is incorrect or missing
Analysis of case shows inadequate levels of analysis of issues of the case, provides little supporting detail
Analysis of case shows adequate levels of analysis of issues of the case, provides supporting details
Analysis of case shows superior levels of analysis of underlying issues that are not necessarily readily apparent, uses appropriate levels of supporting detail
Recommendation and Conclusions
10
Recommendations and/or plans of action provided that are mostly incorrect or absent
Recommendations also at and/or plans of action provided that are partially correct, alternate viewpoints not considered
Specific recommendations and/or plans of action provided that are substantially correct, alternate viewpoints may be considered
Specific recommendations and/or plans of action provided that go beyond the expected scope of the case fully supported by data, alternate viewpoints fully considered
Organization & Critical Thinking
Coherence, Cohesion, organization, demonstration of thought process, analysis of problem using own thoughts and ideas
20
Similarities and differences have been clearly organized using either the block or thematic method.
Very clear relationship between ideas
Accurate use of connectors
Accurate use of pronouns
Clear match between the topic sentence, supporting sentences and concluding sentence in each body paragraph
Similarities and differences are organized generally clearly using the block or thematic method but one of the paragraphs may cover more than one main idea
Generally clear relationship between ideas
Mostly correct use of connectors.
Mostly correct use of pronouns
The topic sentence, supporting sentences and concluding sentence (if any) support one main idea.
Similarities and differences are organized generally clearly using the block or thematic method but one of the paragraphs may cover more than one main idea
Generally clear relationship between ideas
Mostly correct use of connectors.
Mostly correct use of pronouns
The topic sentence, supporting sentences and concluding sentence (if any) support one main idea.
Similarities and differences have been clearly organized using either the block or thematic method.
Very clear relationship between ideas
Accurate use of connectors
Accurate use of pronouns
Clear match between the topic sentence, supporting sentences and concluding sentence in each body paragraph
Style & Mechanics
APA
Application of the requirements of the 7th APA manual to create a standardized formatted presentation
10
7th Ed. APA Manual is not followed or there are significant errors in:
title page & references pages. In-text citations, paraphrasing and direct quotes are quite inadequate but do not rise to the level of plagiarism
7th Ed. APA Manual is followed with significant errors in:
title page & references pages. In-text citations, paraphrasing and direct quotes are lacking but do not rise to the level of plagiarism
7th Ed. APA Manual is followed with minor errors in:
formatted title page, formatted references pages, in-text citations, paraphrasing and direct quotes are adequately used in the correct context
7th Ed. APA Manual is followed with no errors including:
properly formatted title page, properly formatted references pages, in-text citations are correctly used, paraphrasing and direct quotes are properly used in the correct context
Grammar/Punctuation/Spelling
Use of proper English language grammar, spelling and punctuation to create a readable presentation.
10
Grammar and sentence structure as depicted at has major problems following standard English rules and reads with difficulty with major errors in punctuation and spelling
Grammar and sentence structure has problems following standard English rules and reads with some difficulty with errors in punctuation and spelling
Grammar and sentence structure mostly follows standard English rules and reads reasonably well with few errors in punctuation and spelling
Grammar and sentence structure follows standard English rules and reads well with excellent punctuation and spelling
Readability & Style
Clarity of thought and appropriate level of language use that brings the author’s thoughts and ideas to the reader.
10
Sentences are lacking in completeness, clearness, conciseness and are not well-structured.
Transitions do not maintain flow of thought.
Words are ambiguous.
Tone is inappropriate to audience/assessment. Colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing is used.
Sentences need to be more complete, clear, concise and well-constructed.
Transitions do not maintain flow of thought well.
Words are not precise and have some ambiguity.
Tone is not appropriate to audience/assessment. Colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing is used too much.
Sentences are mostly complete, clear, concise and well-constructed.
Transitions mostly maintain flow of thought.
Words are mostly precise with little ambiguity.
Tone is mostly appropriate to audience/assessment. Colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing is used sparingly.
Sentences are consistently complete, clear, concise and well-constructed with strong, varied structure.
Transitions consistently maintain flow of thought.
Words are quite precise and unambiguous.
Tone is completely appropriate to audience/assessment. No colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing used.
Marks
100
Additional Comments
