CRJ 180 Assignment
This is the rubric that needs to be followed……
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 120 |
Assignment 1: Combating Juvenile Delinquency |
||||
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 60% F |
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
1. Identify at least two (2) juvenile delinquency reduction efforts / programs currently in operation in your community. Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely identified at least two (2) juvenile delinquency reduction efforts / programs currently in operation in your community. |
Insufficiently identified at least two (2) juvenile delinquency reduction efforts / programs currently in operation in your community. |
Partially identified at least two (2) juvenile delinquency reduction efforts / programs currently in operation in your community. |
Satisfactorilyidentified at least two (2) juvenile delinquency reduction efforts / programs currently in operation in your community. |
Thoroughly identified at least two (2) juvenile delinquency reduction efforts / programs currently in operation in your community. |
2. Determine the main sociological theories that underlie these interventions that shape your community’s public policy for delinquency prevention. |
Did not submit or incompletely determined the main sociological theories that underlie these interventions that shape your community’s public policy for delinquency prevention. |
Insufficiently determined the main sociological theories that underlie these interventions that shape your community’s public policy for delinquency prevention. |
Partially determined the main sociological theories that underlie these interventions that shape your community’s public policy for delinquency prevention. |
Satisfactorily determined the main sociological theories that underlie these interventions that shape your community’s public policy for delinquency prevention. |
Thoroughly determined the main sociological theories that underlie these interventions that shape your community’s public policy for delinquency prevention. |
3. Propose one to two (1–2) ideas that you believe would improve your community’s juvenile delinquency prevention efforts. Justify the response with examples that illustrate your ideas being used successfully in other communities. Weight: 30% |
Did not submit or incompletely proposed one to two (1–2) ideas that you believe would improve your community’s juvenile delinquency prevention efforts. Did not submit or incompletely justified the response with examples that illustrate your ideas being used successfully in other communities. |
Insufficiently proposed one to two (1–2) ideas that you believe would improve your community’s juvenile delinquency prevention efforts. Insufficiently justified the response with examples that illustrate your ideas being used successfully in other communities. |
Partially proposed one to two (1–2) ideas that you believe would improve your community’s juvenile delinquency prevention efforts. Partially justified the response with examples that illustrate your ideas being used successfully in other communities. |
Satisfactorily proposed one to two (1–2) ideas that you believe would improve your community’s juvenile delinquency prevention efforts. Satisfactorily justified the response with examples that illustrate your ideas being used successfully in other communities. |
Thoroughly proposed one to two (1–2) ideas that you believe would improve your community’s juvenile delinquency prevention efforts. Thoroughly justified the response with examples that illustrate your ideas being used successfully in other communities. |
4. 3 references Weight: 5% |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
More than 8 errors present |
7-8 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |