Explore the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) website: www.ninr.nih.gov/Review their publication Bringing science to life order code; 00250030019A
Type of Service coursework
Urgency 6 to 10 hours
No. of Pages/Wordcount 6 page(s)/1650 Words
Citation Style APA Style
Detailed Description/Explanation Explore the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) website: www.ninr.nih.gov/Review their publication Bringing science to life: NINR strategic plan (2011, p. 7) to identify the current priorities for nursing research. Do you agree with the priorities or would you recommend addition or elimination of some of the priorities? What effect do the nursing research priorities have on nursing researchers?
What criteria must be met in order to consider a practice, evidence-based? Provide examples. Explain the role quality plays in evidence-based practice?
Based on the information you’ve learned to this point, write a research proposal that relates to the topics you chose for a previous assignment. Be sure to include the following information in your proposal:
Hypothesis
Theory
Design model
Method
Anticipated results
Potential Dissemination Avenues
The assignment should be between 1500 and 2000 words in length and contain at least two scholarly sources, in addition to the textbook and provided material. Please submit your assignment in one APA formatted document. PLEASE USE REFERNCES WITHIN FIVE(5) YEARS AND APA FORMAT.
*******************************
Message to the writer
these are examples of feedback I received on my assignments, as well as several low grades. Please send me a paper that is original, has references that are within five years, and a really great APA formatted paper with a clear Introduction, clealr labled and a organized conlusion, thanks,
1.) Thank you for your submission. I’ve provided feedback and scoring. All required content was discussed, minus a clearly labeled and discussed conclusion. The introduction was brief and did not provide a clear purpose. See all comments to improve.
Organization Weight: 25%: Introduction is brief and requires a purpose statement. There is no clearly labeled and discussed conclusion as required. See all comments.
Support Weight: 20%: Multiple errors. See comments.
Quality of Written Communication Weight: 10%: All papers written within this course need to be in third person.
2.) I’ve provided feedback and scoring. There are many areas to work on and improve. Please see all of my comments.
Content Weight: 30%: It appears that some of the topics are discussed. Each paper requires a properly labeled heading to help organize the information presented as well as lets me know as the reader that you covered all required content. This was put out within course announcements.
Organization Weight: 25%: The introductory paragraph needs a purpose statement. see comment. In addition, there is disorganization as there are no other headings organizing the required content being discussed.
Support Weight: 20%: Errors present. See comments.
Quality of Written Communication Weight: 10%: All papers are to be written in third person and no reference to “I”.
.
