***Reserved for Ultimate_Writer**

Rubric Name: Stage 3 Grading Rubric for Kellys Salon Assignment       Criteria90-100% Far Above Standards80-89% Above Standards70-79% Meets Standards60-69% Below Standards< 60% Well Below StandardsHigh/ Medium/ Low or N/A Rankings20 points18-20 Points Rankings all demonstrate a strong understanding of course concepts, analysis and critical thinking; and are appropriate for the business in the case study and the process.17 points16-17 PointsMost rankings demonstrate an understanding of course concepts, analysis and critical thinking; and are appropriate for the business in the case study and the process.15 points14-15 PointsRankings are designated and demonstrate a basic understanding of course concepts or analysis.13 points12-13 PointsRankings are provided but selection may be lacking in demonstration of understanding of course concepts or analysis.0 points0-11 PointsFew, if any rankings provided or rankings are not appropriate for the process and/or the case study.Explanation for Rankings60 points54-60 PointsExplanations are at least three good sentences which use course vocabulary to clearly and convincingly justify rankings; demonstrate a strong understanding of course concepts, analysis, and critical thinking; and are focused on the business in the case study and the process and its data.53 points48-53 PointsExplanations are at least three good sentences which use course vocabulary to clearly justify most rankings and demonstrate an understanding of course concepts, analysis, and critical thinking; and are focused on the business in the case study and the process and its data.47 points42-47 PointsExplanations are at least three good sentences that justify rankings and refer to the case study process and/or its data.41 points36-41 PointsSeveral explanations are less than three good sentences, and/or do not adequately justify rankings; may be lacking in demonstration ofunderstanding of course concepts, analysis, and/or critical thinking; or are not focused on the business in the case study.0 points0-35 PointsFew, if any explanations are provided; explanations are incomplete or not compatible with rankings; or little effort demonstrated.References10 points9-10 PointsTwo or more sources–one source should be within the IFSM 300 course content and one external (other than the course materials) are incorporated and used effectively. Sources used are relevant and timely and contribute to the analysis.  References are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style.8 points8 PointsAt least one source is incorporated and used effectively. Source(s) are relevant and contribute to the analysis. References are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style.7 points7 PointsAt least one resource used and properly incorporated into the text. Reference is cited using APA style.6 points6 PointsA reference source is included, but is not properly incorporated or used and/or is not effective or appropriate and/or is not relevant or timely; and/or does not follow APA style for references and citations.0 points0-5 PointsNo research is incorporated or reference listed is not cited within text.Format10 points9-10 PointsInformation is professionally presented, clear and easily understood; is written in third person and uses course vocabulary, correct sentence structure, grammar, and spelling. Generic strategy and process to be improved are correctly identified.8 points8 PointsInformation is presented well; is clear, and uses correct sentence structure; written in third person, and has few grammar, and spelling errors. Generic strategy and process to be improved are correctly identified.7 points7 PointsInformation is presented with some grammar and/or spelling errors. Generic strategy and process to be improved are correctly identified.6 points6 PointsInformation is not professionally presented, may not be clearly written, and/or contains several grammar and/or spelling errors. Generic strategy and/or process to be improved may be incorrect or missing.0 points0-5 PointsInformation is extremely poorly written; has many grammar and/or spelling errors; and/or does not convey the information adequately. Generic strategy and process to be improved are not provided.Overall Score90-100% Far Above Standards90 or more80-89% Above Standards80 or more70-79% Meets Standards70 or more60-69% Below Standards60 or more< 60% Well Below Standards0 or more