Week 2 Discussion 1
April 22nd, 2022
Read the Case Campbell Soup Co. v. Wentz in the text. Answer the following questions:
- What were the terms of the contract between Campbell and the Wentzes?
- Did the Wentzes perform under the contract?
- Did the court find specific performance to be an adequate legal remedy in this case?
- Why did the court refuse to help Campbell in enforcing its legal contract?
- How could Campbell change its contract in the future so as to avoid the unconsionability problem?
Rogers, S. (2012). Essentials of Business Law [Electronic version]. Retrieved from
- Chapter 4: Contracts: Offer, Acceptance, and Consideration
- Chapter 5: Contracts: Capacity, Genuine Assent, the Statute of Frauds, and Illegality
- Chapter 6: Third Parties, Performance and Discharge of Contracts, and Remedies
- Chapter 7: The UCC: Formation and Modification of the Sales Contract